CO129-294 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [10-12] — Page 400

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

I Perritory should have been

cut down at $50,000 instead

of $100,000 unless it is

anticipated that arrears

of

Rent for 1899 will be received

during the current year.

6 I am still awaiting infor-

mation as to the items of Revenue

referred to in my Despatch No.

258 of

the 15th November last.

7 It is

to be regretted

that many

items

of

Expenditure as indicated below

have not been placed

upon the Estimates but will have

to be met by a Supplementary

Estimate, & I desire to confess

that the Annual

Estimates should always include

the total Expenditure, so far

as it can

by any

means be

anticipated & I hope to explain

with reference to your remarks

in your speech to the

Council enclosed in

your

Despatch under ack't that it

is not absolutely necessary to

confine

the Estimates of

Expenditure there is no

objection

to the Govt submitting in

the Estimates for the S of S

Page 397

MINUTE.

Mr. Antrobus.

Mr. Cox.

Mr. Lucas.

Mr. Graham.

Sir E. Wingfield.

Earl of Selborne.

Mr. Chamberlain.

Edit History

2026-05-31 10:19:18 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
I Perritory should have been cut down at $50,000 instead of $100,000 unless it is anticipated that arrears of Rent for 1899 will be received during the current year. 6 I am still awaiting infor- mation as to the items of Revenue referred to in my Despatch No. 258 of the 15th November last. 7 It is to be regretted that many items of Expenditure as indicated below have not been placed upon the Estimates but will have to be met by a Supplementary Estimate, & I desire to confess that the Annual Estimates should always include the total Expenditure, so far as it can by any means be anticipated & I hope to explain with reference to your remarks in your speech to the Council enclosed in your Despatch under ack't that it is not absolutely necessary to confine the Estimates of Expenditure there is no objection to the Govt submitting in the Estimates for the S of S Page 397 MINUTE. Mr. Antrobus. Mr. Cox. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir E. Wingfield. Earl of Selborne. Mr. Chamberlain.
Baseline (Original)
I Perritory should have been fut down at $$$50,000 instead of $100,000 unless it is anticipated that arrears DRAFT. of Reat for 1899 will be received during the current gear. 6 I am still awriting infor as to the items of Revenue pan: 8 g referred to in my Despatch ho 258 of the 15th November last 7 It is продава tibe regretted items f that marry Expenditure as indicated below boere not have not bee has placed upon the Extemmates but will have to be met by a Supplementary Mr. Mr. MINUTE. Mr. Antrobus. Mr. Cox. Mr. Lucas, Mr. Graham. Sir E. Wingfield. Earl of Selborne . Mr. Chamberlain. 397 Estimate, & I desire to cenfress серого дог that the Annual Estimates should always include the total Expenditure, so for as it can by any Loull meaus be anticipated & I boon to explain with reference to you rathe in your speech to the Council enclosed in Leg: your Despatch under ack't that it is not absolutely the ceway confide the relemmates of Extendition there is no objection to the Goors seebmitting in the letimates for the S of
2026-05-31 10:19:18 · Baseline
View content

I Perritory should have been

fut down at $$$50,000 instead

of $100,000 unless it is

anticipated that arrears

DRAFT.

of

Reat for 1899 will be received

during the current gear.

6 I am still awriting infor

as to the items of Revenue

pan: 8 g

referred to in my Despatch ho

258 of

the 15th November last

7 It is

продава

tibe regretted

items

f

that marry

Expenditure as indicated below

boere not

have not bee has placed

upon the Extemmates but will have

to be met by a Supplementary

Mr.

Mr.

MINUTE.

Mr. Antrobus.

Mr. Cox.

Mr. Lucas,

Mr. Graham.

Sir E. Wingfield.

Earl of Selborne .

Mr. Chamberlain.

397

Estimate, & I desire to cenfress

серого дог

that the Annual

Estimates should always include

the total Expenditure, so for

as it can

by any

Loull

meaus be

anticipated & I boon to explain

with reference to you rathe

in your speech to the

Council enclosed in

Leg:

your

Despatch under ack't that it

is not absolutely the ceway

confide

the relemmates of

Extendition there is no

objection

to the Goors seebmitting in

the letimates for the S of Sé

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.